home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / dcom / modems-part1 / 7842 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  999 b 
  1. Path: piglet.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
  2. From: victor@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vic Menayang)
  3. Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems
  4. Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
  5. Date: 13 Mar 1996 22:56:17 -0600
  6. Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
  7. Message-ID: <4i88th$qj7@piglet.cc.utexas.edu>
  8. References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <jpa-0903961739590001@ana1054.deltanet.com> <4htnon$i4f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk>
  9. Reply-To: victor@mail.utexas.edu
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: piglet.cc.utexas.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <5ynumDAxPtQxEwJA@nts1.demon.co.uk>,
  13. John Stanners  <webmaster@glen.co.uk> wrote:
  14. :In article <4htnon$i4f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu>, Vic Menayang
  15. :<victor@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu> writes
  16. :>with the regular Sportster, the problem at 57.6 setting
  17. :>with the old 28.8 (I don't know about the 33.6).
  18. :
  19. :Could you expand, what is the problem at 57.6
  20. :
  21.  
  22. Sometime the modem just wouldn't take any commands at that speed
  23. setting.  No probelm at 115.2 or 38.4.
  24.